Blogs Are Dying? Say What?

On Saturday in Shreveport, I spoke before the 2011 class of the New Leaders Council- Louisiana about online political activism and the role and influence of the blogosphere. If you read this site, you’re probably not too surprised that I have a few things to share about the blogosphere, and I thank the NLC-Louisiana fellows for hearing me out.

Today, The New York Times ran an article about the waning popularity of blogs, suggesting that social networking websites like Facebook and Twitter are eclipsing blogs and becoming the preferred platforms for connecting with others to share information, videos, and opinions.

Blogs went largely unchallenged until Facebook reshaped consumer behavior with its all-purpose hub for posting everything social. Twitter, which allows messages of no longer than 140 characters, also contributed to the upheaval.

No longer did Internet users need a blog to connect with the world. They could instead post quick updates to complain about the weather, link to articles that infuriated them, comment on news events, share photos or promote some cause — all the things a blog was intended to do.

On the surface, this seems relatively obvious and intuitive. During my presentation on Saturday, I spoke about the meteoric rise of Facebook. I joined Facebook when it was still called The Facebook; my college was one of the first dozen or so that Facebook targeted. Facebook officially launched in February of 2004; I’m not entirely certain, but I think I joined in May. Within a few weeks, it seemed like nearly everyone at Rice was on Facebook, even if most of us weren’t quite sure what the benefits were.

Facebook is now the most popular and most visited website on the internet: over 500 million users, 70% of whom live outside of the United States. As has been exhaustively reported, Facebook also played a key role in the recent revolution in Egypt. I used this photo during my presentation on Saturday as an illustration:

Today, we learned:

A man in Egypt has named his newborn daughter “Facebook” in honor of the role the social media network played in bringing about a revolution, according to a new report.

You have to wonder what Mark Zuckerberg thinks about all of this. During the last few months, he’s been the subject of a hugely successful and award-winning movie, The Social Network; he was named Time Magazine’s Person of the Year, and now, his website is, in part, being credited with facilitating a revolution in Egypt– a revolution that, right now, appears to have inspired a ripple effect across the Middle East. Today, there is a baby girl in Egypt named Facebook, and for the rest of her life, she will remind people of the role of a social networking website in toppling a dictator.

It’s incredible.

But still, The New York Times missed the mark today. The blogosphere is not waning. It’s adapting to rapid changes in social networking, and that’s a good thing. Again, from The Times:

“If you’re looking for substantive conversation, you turn to blogs,” Ms. Camahort Page said. “You aren’t going to find it on Facebook, and you aren’t going to find it in 140 characters on Twitter.”

Lee Rainie, director of the Internet and American Life Project, says that blogging is not so much dying as shifting with the times. Entrepreneurs have taken some of the features popularized by blogging and weaved them into other kinds of services.

“The act of telling your story and sharing part of your life with somebody is alive and well — even more so than at the dawn of blogging,” Mr. Rainie said. “It’s just morphing onto other platforms.”

I disagree with Ms. Camahort Page: It is possible to find a substantive conversation on Facebook and even on Twitter, though it’s not always easy. Lee Rainie is more on target.

Caitlin Dickson of The Atlantic responded to The Times in a post titled “Blogging’s Not Dead, Says Bloggers.”

Here’s my take:

The blogosphere is, thankfully, becoming more mature and more professional. It shouldn’t be surprising that many hobbyist bloggers are transitioning to social networking platforms. The truth is, these people are still “blogging,” in the broadest sense of the term; they’re just moving their base of operations. Facebook has a built-in audience; it’s not as easy to build a dedicated readership on your own.

But there will always be a blogosphere, and the recent proliferation of social networking websites can only strengthen the visibility and the credibility of the professional blogosphere. I agree with blogger Matt Schuler:

If you have something that can fit in 140 characters or less, share it on Twitter and Facebook. But if you have a long, complete thought that won’t fit then write it out. You can post the link on your social networks.

And guess what?

If used correctly, social networks can actually augment a blog’s readership, traffic, visibility, and credibility. Some suggest that The Times is quick to dismiss the blogosphere because of their own institutional bias against what they may perceive as a threat to traditional media. Maybe so. But more than likely, they’re still just behind the times (Pardon the pun).

Responses

liprap

February 22, 2011

Huh. Ran into one of those “blogging is dead” articles not too long ago, myself.

http://humidcity.com/2011/02/02/shut-it-down-the-partys-over/

Of course, it was from the perspective of blogs as sustainable platforms for commerce and jumping-off points for journalists and columnists.

What I’m finding is that I put a link on Twitter to my blog or to my Flickr account and many more hits register than if I just let the thing sit for a while. I still have more to say that can’t fit into a tweet or isn’t going to be claimed by Mark Zuckerberg, who also seems to have a thing not just about tweaking our notions of privacy, but also about messing with the ownership of content on Facebook.

Have you read “The Accidental Billionaires”? It makes Zuckerberg look like one slippery character.

Reply
Jim

February 22, 2011

I agree with liprap. When I put a link to my blog posts on Twitter they automatically post to my Facebook account. This greatly increases traffic to the blog and keeps people up to date with the blog. I see the social media sites as an enhancement.

Reply
Andrea

February 22, 2011

Recently, I have pondered if Facebook was changing when and how people blog because I have experienced the change first hand. After joining Facebook, I do post most of pictures and happenings there. One of the reasons I started a blog was because I did not like MySpace and I have family everywhere and became weary of updating them on my life. I have the only granddaughter in the family and people are intrigued as to why we would by an old house and what we are doing to it. I for one have noticed a lack of enthusiasm for blogging now that I am a member of Facebook. So, I would fall under the hobbyist blog category. However, I do have a subscription to many blogs and still lurk and read the ones that are the most interesting, original and intelligent. I don’t see blogs going anywhere soon. I think I would see the newspaper die out before that…some blogs, in my opinion, are more credible and better researched THAN the newspaper.

Reply
Ace Midnight

February 22, 2011

Lamar – clearly we are in a period of rapid transformation. If we consider the information age started, roughly, during the Space Age, give or take 1967 (the year of my birth) as an arbitrary stating point – during my lifetime, from kindergarten through middle school, I was educated and communicated with others, roughly the same way as kids in the Renaissance did(wrote letters and read printed material). The notable exceptions were telephone calls (which I rarely received from faraway places – long distance charges were an important issue until the mid-1990s.), television and radio news, television based educational programs, such as Sesame Street, and the availability of educational audio/visual material such as music, film, filmstrips, etc. Modern libraries, circa 1980, still relied on card catalogues and reference materials ranging from a few months to 40 or 50 years out of date.

During the time I was in Law School, (’93 to ’96), two major things occurred in the United States: cellular service became readily affordable to most in the middle class and AOL starting sending out enough discs to cover the land mass of the Earth, thus placing the “intarwebs” within reach of most people who had a telephone connection. In the past 20 (15 really)years, the internet has exploded, as have the instant communication between person to person. Blogging is a more “interactive” (I can remember when that was a buzzword) version of opinion journalism. It is a hybrid of “Old” and “New” media, which is one of its strengths.

I am opting out of Facebook, for now. I do not “tweet” (whatever that is) and I still text, IM and email using punctuation and in the Queen’s English, so I may be in the rapidly vanishing herd of dinosaurs. However, I tend to agree with you that the tools are not mutually exclusive – a blogger can utilize social networking sites in a synergistic manner, regardless of whether his goals are political, economic, altruistic, or whatever.

The unfortunate downside in all of this is, at least I have noticed, a rapidly disintegrating capability of young people to effectively communicate anything other than emotions – they seem wholly incapable of constructing whole sentences, grasp concrete ideas or think and argue critically. They are very capable of processing and filtering large amounts of information, but cannot do very much with it.

Am I sounding too much like my parents?

Reply
Alex Cenla

February 22, 2011

Ace , may I exclaim a loud and resounding AMEN to your comments!
And I lament the loss of verbal discourse!
Alex

Reply