During the last 24 hours, as a result of my recent post, “Chronic Failures of Louisiana Secretary of State’s Website Raise Serious Questions About the Integrity of Elections,” I’ve taken a crash course in how elections are reported in Orleans Parish. I am not entirely satisfied with what I’ve learned, but I should give credit where credit is due: I am impressed by the response I received from the Secretary of State’s office.

If you missed the original post, here’s some background: Shortly after polls closed in Orleans Parish on Saturday, WWL-TV’s “election consultant” Greg Rigamer called the New Orleans Mayor’s race for the incumbent, Mitch Landrieu. According to WWL, Mr. Rigamer was basing his projection on his analysis of early voting. For election watchers, like myself, that seemed strange; early voting numbers hadn’t even been posted. Rigamer made his call at 8:16PM; the Secretary of State’s website didn’t post a single vote until 8:46PM. But, frankly, that, in and of itself, wasn’t the real cause of concern or suspicion. The problem was: Mr. Rigamer’s company has a $2 million contract with the Louisiana Secretary of State, a contract that includes, among other things, the development of the Elections Registration and Information Network (or “ERIN”). ERIN is the system the Secretary of State uses to publish election results.

I wasn’t peddling a conspiracy theory. Given the facts and the sequence of events, I think it was more than fair to ask questions about the integrity of the process and about Mr. Rigamer’s role and his access.

But, knowing what I know now, it wasn’t very fair of me (or for my friends at The Gambit) to suggest that the Louisiana Secretary of State’s office was somehow responsible for the delays in reporting or that their website had crashed on Saturday night. Their website didn’t crash; it just sat on idle.

Earlier tonight, I spoke with Meg Casper, the Press Secretary for Secretary of State Tom Schedler. According to Ms. Casper, their office was also extremely frustrated by the delays in reporting election results on Saturday night, but these delays were, ultimately, not within their control. The issue, as I now understand, is that early votes are counted by the Orleans Parish Board of Supervisors of Elections at the Registar’s Office. The Board begins counting votes around 2:30PM on election day, and if you are inclined to watch them count votes, you’re more than welcome to show up as long as you turn off your cell phone and agree to be sequestered until the polls close at 8PM.

However, the Clerk of Court- not the Registrar- is actually responsible for providing election results to the Secretary of State’s offices via an encrypted network. In most parishes, the Registrar’s Office is directly down the hall from the Clerk of Court’s Office, which means, for all intents and purposes, that when the polls close on election night, the early votes are uploaded almost immediately. In Orleans Parish, however, the Registrar’s offices are located at City Hall, on Perdido Street, and the Clerk of Court’s offices are on Tulane.

Here’s what apparently happened on Saturday night: Someone had the smart and obvious idea to show up and watch the Board of Supervisors of Elections count the early and absentee ballots. When the clock struck 8PM and the polls officially closed, this observer was able to transmit these results to Mr. Rigamer, who then, ostensibly, plugged them into his model and made the projection. When WWL and Mr. Rigamer made the call at 8:16PM, it’s more than likely that neither the Clerk of Court nor the Secretary of State had even seen the results; at 8:16PM, the “cartridges” containing early voting numbers were probably sitting in the passenger seat of a car on Poydras.

Screen Shot 2014-02-04 at 12.13.08 AM

That said, as the map above indicates, the drive between City Hall and the Clerk of Court should take, at most, seven minutes. Considering it took more than 45 minutes for the results to get posted, it’s obvious that someone at the Registrar’s Office was taking their sweet time. That’s inexcusable, particularly in an election as consequential as the one held on Saturday.

It is also completely avoidable: According to Ms. Casper, there is nothing that would have or should have prevented the Orleans Parish Board of Supervisors of Elections from counting early and absentee ballots in the Clerk of Court’s offices. As I have come to appreciate, these delays have been an ongoing source of frustration for the Secretary of State, because the public and the media rely on their website, almost entirely, for real-time election results. If their website sits idle for nearly an hour on election night, people notice.

Again, it was unfair for me to imply that the Secretary of State’s website was the underlying problem here. Truth be told, as I said to Ms. Casper, Louisiana’s Secretary of State has one of the most robust websites of its kind in the entire country. They’ve spent a ton of money resolving the problems they previously experienced, and I, for one, have noticed.

But it’d also be unfair for me to sweep all of this under the rug and pretend as if I was wrong for raising some serious questions about the integrity of our electoral process and the providence and security of the Elections Registration and Information Network, which has been described as “keys to the castle.” There’s still a glaring problem here: The contractor who helped build ERIN for the Secretary of State is also calling elections as a paid media consultant.

As I said from the beginning, I don’t know what, exactly, Mr. Rigamer’s company has provided for the Louisiana Secretary of State, but I know what they’ve asked them to provide. And I know that, for $2 million, his company has likely done a substantial amount of work. I also know that the Louisiana Secretary of State is taking all of this very seriously. Ms. Casper told me, in no uncertain terms, that their office will evaluate and clarify their policy on contractors participating in election day media coverage. They seemed keenly aware of the ways in which their contractor’s dual roles created the perception of a conflict.

If I were a gambling man, I would bet that Saturday was the last time Mr. Rigamer appears as a media consultant on election night.

7 thoughts

  1. Nice, but misses the larger point of Rigamer’s company running voter databases for the Secretary of State’s office and selling services to campaigns that include voter lists. I don’t care what Greg Rigamer does on TV. I do care that a company that apparently controls the state’s voter database and (to a large extent) vote tabulating process, is actively involved in partisan politics that is influence in no small part by the chokehold it has on the state’s data, elections operations and website. If the Secretary of State is not capable of running his own elections office, then the company that gets the outsourcing contract should be prohibited from any involvement in electoral activity on behalf of any candidate or political organization.

    1. Point well taken, Mike, and as you know, I agree that this should be a major cause of concern. I want to be careful here, though, because the LA SoS told me, specifically, that Mr. Rigamer did not have access to ERIN on election night and that he actually purchased the voter files he used for his modeling from them, just like anyone else. Yes, it seems- at face value- a little strange that a contractor whose company has a $2M deal with the LA SoS to “develop and support” ERIN wouldn’t be able to access ERIN or that he’d need to pay for information that his company likely helped generate (Unless anyone can prove to the contrary, I will give the LA SoS the benefit of the doubt). That said, I’m not interested in impugning anyone’s personal integrity, and I have absolutely no evidence that Mr. Rigamer did anything illegal, unethical, or improper. As I mentioned at the beginning of this post, I wasn’t entirely satisfied with the answers I received. But I am satisfied that the LA SoS is taking these questions very seriously. I’ve spilled barrels of ink on other agencies in Louisiana, and instead of reaching out, they’ve only dug in deeper. I’m happy they are taking all of this under consideration, and I really appreciate their pro-active response. My advice is: Keep asking those questions, because the answers exist.

  2. I work the polls – around 7:20pm this young woman walked into the room (looking like a deer in headlights) she popped down her DL – I looke and asked what her “address” was in the areas of the precincts so that I could send her to the correct table. We have 4 in our voting place. She stated she was from WWL, she had on a computer made – (hello my name is sticker) with her name WWL and {precinct worker” on it. She wanted info…. I immediately explained that she was not a registered poll watcher and that we would and could not give her any info…she still is looking like a deer…..gets on the cell and calls someone…they tell her to tell us to call Arthur Morrell…. I explained to her that she could call anyone she liked but that she was NOT a registered poll watcher….the conversation went on with whom ever was ont he phone and finally I ask for the phone…and explained that she nor WWL were registered polls watchers – he states she was allowed to get the results when posted…I informed him that is was now only 7:30 and that she could indeed “read” those results after they were posted…but she had to stay outside the building…she sat ont he floor int he hall and when the polls closed she was asked to leave…..our results were not posted until around 8:15…..so they could have had a person at ever voting location. This poor girl didn’t know squat….and I imagine that if anyone working the polls didn’t heed the watchers list..and was blinded by the computer made (hello my name is sticker) on her shirt…they could have given her the number of voters but until the polls close and the results are run – no one knows. If she or anyone remained inside the polling locations WHILE the results were being run and they were NOT on the watchers list this is a violation.

  3. Good post, Lamar. And kudos for the LA SOS taking an open stance on the questions on the table. (And also kudos to Greg Rigarmer for covering his butt and making sure that the state owned data that his company is employing is not bootleg data.)
    In an effort to keep up with the technology available we should consider changing the way the returns are handled. 1) Print and post the results for each precinct on sight at the close of voting, 2) transmit the data electronically to the COC office, 3) retransmit the data to the ROV and SOS, 4) transport the data cartridges and provisional votes to the COC office for counter proof and safe keeping. Unless there is a delay in closing the polls in order to allow voters in line at the close of voting to exercise their right there should be a time guideline for vote data transmittal from the precincts.

  4. Good start, but you are grossly understating the amount of money that Greg Rigamer has received from the Secretary of State’s office. Since 2005 GCR has received in excess of $25 million in professional services contracts in connection with the conversion of the SOS system away from its original platform. Sadly most of these contracts no longer appear in the on-line Trac data base.

  5. While it’s true that if you bought credits you can’t get them
    off of your account, you do have some other ways to get credits to your
    friends and family. While it may be difficult at first, take some
    time away from the site. You can also earn Facebook Credits
    through trials, surveys, and other deals.

  6. Adultery, as I have stated previously, causes spouses and families
    untold pain. Remember that the comments you leave
    on another page should be professional in nature. With that in mind, the page
    created should be a digital representation of your class and curriculum, not a
    page that is strictly teacher-oriented.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s