In May 2009, Louisiana College President Joe Aguillard penned an editorial to The Baptist Message about the need for like-minded Baptists to engage in a type of warfare “against the rulers, against the authorities, against the powers of this dark world.” It wasn’t merely a rhetorical flourish. Aguillard directly accused President Barack Obama of being a “murderer,” claiming that the President was responsible for “carrying the banner” of allowing the murder of “21 babies per second.” Quoting (bold mine):

The enemy is attacking the Christian’s territory and he is doing so at an exponential pace.

The murder of our unborn is occurring at a rate of 21 babies per second!

The President of the United States is carrying the banner to continue these murders at an even faster pace and to also use our tax dollars to expand the murder overseas.

If we use Biblical truth to define our president and those in Congress as murderers – and that is what they are, murderers – as those who have perpetuated this murderous plot, will they imprison us?

That threat will not silence us!  Will you stand and fight?

Here is a link to the full editorial, which was, at some point, migrated to a different page.

In the editorial, Aguillard also compared a hate crimes bill that punishes criminals who inflict physical violence against a person because of their sexual orientation as a direct attack on Christians who only seek to express God’s Word. Quoting again:

The enemy is attacking the Christian’s territory by convincing our nation that marriage is really not a sacred bond between a man, a woman and God.  Rather, we are told that it is a choice between persons of the same or the opposite sex.  Both choices, many maintain, are to be viewed as legitimate. . . .

Encouraged by the President, the U.S. House of Representatives recently passed a Hate Crimes Bill that could make it illegal for Christians to declare that what the Word of Almighty God says about the practice of homosexuality and same-sex marriage.

If the aforementioned legislation ultimately becomes law, many believe that a Christian could be thrown in jail for proclaiming God’s law. Well, consider me and our faculty at LC ready for jail, for we will not bow to the lies of satan.

I only mention this because today, it was brought to my attention that he continues to preach the same message to those in the LC community, including the ridiculous line about Christians being persecuted by a bill that specifically addresses punishing violent criminals, using this bill, either ignorantly or insidiously, as a reason to “fight against the enemy.”

I’ve never met anyone who is “pro-abortion,” but it is an absolute lie to proclaim as fact, particularly from the pulpit, that “21 babies are aborted every second.” Aguillard repeated this egregiously exaggerated lie only a couple of months ago, in an address in front of the Louisiana College student body (jump to the 45 minute mark on the video). Michael D. Smith explains:

21 babies per second. That is 1,260 babies per minute, 75,600 babies per hour, 1,814,400 babies per day, and 662,256,000 per year.

The population of the United States is less than half that number. The world-wide population of women is 3,386,509,865 (www.geohive.com). The global population of childbearing women (aged 15-50) is 1,755,000,000 (www.census.gov). Therefore, if Mr. Aguillard is correct (assuming that he is talking about the number of abortions in the world, rather than just in the USA), that would mean that every year, no less than one third of all child bearing women have an abortion. However, if he is talking about women in the United States, that would mean that on average every woman in the United States would have about 9 abortions per year.

The actual number of abortions worldwide is less than 7% of what Aguillard claims, and abortions, worldwide and here in the United States, have been on the decline since 1993.

I was reared in the First United Methodist Church in Alexandria. As a teenager, I occasionally taught a small Bible Study class, and when I was in college, I double-majored in English and Religious Studies. I am not and have never been a conservative Southern Baptist and would never claim to be an expert in the Southern Baptist tradition.

I decided to post about this for a few reasons: Professor Reynoso’s letter reminded me of the importance of championing honesty above loyalty. As I said in the previous post about Louisiana College, I want nothing more than to see it succeed and excel. Many of my family members and close friends are proud graduates of Louisiana College. It’s a vitally important institution in Central Louisiana.

It’s never easy to speak truth to power, particularly when those in power believe that any criticism is evil or the result of Satan’s influence. You either agree with us, or you’re doing the work of the devil.

A few weeks ago, The Town Talk published an article about a study conducted in 2010 by Aramark that suggested Louisiana College needs to spend more than $35 million on repairing its existing infrastructure, simply to address deferred maintenance. I have no way of knowing how the paper obtained the study, but once they did, they reported on it. Quoting from Billy Gunn of The Town Talk:

Louisiana College is pursuing $10 million to produce a movie based on the 1960s sitcom “Green Acres,” adding to the tens, or hundreds, of millions of dollars the 104-year-old Baptist college is seeking in aggressive expansion beyond the Pineville campus.

All the while, buildings on campus sit needing millions of dollars in repairs, according to a study done for LC by Aramark Higher Education in a report commissioned in 2010.

The response from leaders at Louisiana College: The Town Talk received a stolen report that was still in draft form. Aguillard told The Baptist Faith that he was considering legal action against the paper and said there was a “spiritual battle” between Louisiana College and the so-called “liberal media.” If you’ve ever read The Town Talk, then you probably would agree: They are not members of the “liberal media,” and they are not interested in waging a spiritual battle against Louisiana College. Louisiana College Trustee Heath Veuleman (allegedly) wrote that The Town Talk‘s entire goal is “to challenge Louisiana College’s credibility and integrity” and implied the newspaper was staffed by the “sycophants and acolytes” who oppose their current administration. According to former LC Professor Reynoso, President Aguillard allegedly also decried The Town Talk‘s coverage as “evil” and “attacks from Satan.”

In December 2010, The Town Talk reported on Louisiana College’s attempt to secure $70 million in funding from the governments of Saudi Arabia and Kuwait to build a medical school right here in Central Louisiana. The paper had received a “draft report,” which was posted on the now-defunct SaveOurLC forum, and shortly thereafter, photos emerged of LC President Aguillard meeting with diplomats from Kuwait while visiting Washington, D.C. Aguillard and his administration had seriously considered attempting to capture a sizable portion of the money pledged by Saudi Arabia and Kuwait for disaster relief after Hurricanes Katrina and Rita in order to fund a medical school. Shortly after the news broke, Aguillard explained his intentions to The Baptist Message:

After the relationship developed with the Kuwait ambassador, he told us that he wanted to introduce us to the Ambassador of Saudi Arabia. He (the Kuwait ambassador) believed that Saudi Arabia, as well as Kuwait, might possibly support some sort of humanitarian effort through the LC medical school. This was the last leg of the journey (seeking possible funding in the amount of $35 million each from Kuwait and Saudi Arabia). Again, let me say, the funds we sought were to have no strings attached.

….

We were not looking for this proposal to Kuwait, and Saudi Arabia, to plug into a funding hole in the general fund-raising for the medical school. It would have been for a specific aspect of the medical school tied in some way to a humanitarian effort. That is all.

….

The money from the proposal would not have come to Louisiana College; it would have gone into the renovation of a state property. So there would have been no piercing of the veil between Louisiana College and foreign money into LC’s budget.

Second, the idea for possibly naming the school after George H.W. Bush was suggested during a discussion with the Kuwait ambassador. The people of Kuwait have a great respect and admiration for President Bush. If the school were named after him, the Kuwaitis would have viewed the gift was being given to President Bush, in his honor, for the renovation.

A third component would have been a mission component; a physician fellowship program where physicians with the International Mission Boards, and from all over the world, would furlough through the medical school. In fact, we are still working with the IMB on that. Medical students from Middle Eastern countries would have also come and, of course, would then be exposed to the gospel.

Recognizing Aguillard’s contention that their proposal was only in draft form and had never even reached the LC Board and that the Kuwaiti ambassador was the driving force behind naming the school after a former President of the United States, it is still worth mentioning this (from the report obtained by The Town Talk):

I understand the proposal that was allegedly “stolen” from LC and “leaked” to The Town Talk may have just been one of many drafts, but either way, it directly contradicts what Aguillard told The Baptist Mission. The State of Louisiana was clearly listed as the party responsible for providing and renovating the property, which makes total sense: The State owns that property.

At the very least, LC considered asking the State of Kuwait to build a $35 million “addition for medical education,” and most importantly, they also considered asking the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia to provide another $35 million for the school’s “endowment” and operations. Yet according to Aguillard, LC wasn’t looking for Saudi Arabia or Kuwait to “plug a hole” in their fundraising gap; apparently, they were simply hoping Saudi Arabia and Kuwait would provide more than half of the money. $70 million out of $136 million wouldn’t fill a “gap” in funds; it’d fill an entire ocean. Quoting again from Aguillard (bold mine):

We would never ask for any operational funds from a non-Christian entity. I don’t care from what country or even the federal government – we treat them all the same: We would not take any funds for the day-to-day operation of this college that have strings attached. The Louisiana Baptist Convention would not approve of it, nor would our Board of Trustees. First, if money had been given would it have gone into a structure owned by the state of Louisiana and not Louisiana College.

Again, although this document may have only been intended as an internal working draft, it nonetheless demonstrates that the leadership of Louisiana College had considered asking for property, operational funds, and an endowment from a “non-Christian entity.” Or, it’s the worst series of typographical errors in the history of Louisiana College.

Once again, from Aguillard (bold mine):

The first meeting that this board [LC Board of Trustees] had with regard to the medical school, we discussed openly addressing a Muslim and/or a non-Christian community coming into our medical school. And they were unanimous: Why should we not work with Muslim people and lead them to Christ? Our mission is to change the world for Christ. If we are going to reach a Muslim world we must communicate with a Muslim world. We made it very clear what our mission is and they were aware of it. However, they recognize the rigor and the credibility and the credentialing that a U.S. school brings to the table with regard to what their students receive. They currently have 800 students in medical schools in Canada, even though they do have their own medical school.

Setting aside the outlandish notion that LC only sought to acquire $70 million in funding from Saudi Arabia and Kuwait in order to “work with the Muslim people and lead them to Christ,” it’s critically important to point out that there are five acclaimed medical schools in Saudi Arabia and one medical school in the small country of Kuwait; they do, in fact, have several medical schools.

I am fully aware that by piecing together all of this readily-accessible and (for the most part) publicly-available information, I am opening up myself to criticism. A handful of folks may even think that my comments are all part of some elaborate ploy by the “liberal media” to “attack” Louisiana College. I have never and would never attack the institution of Louisiana College. Central Louisianans need and cherish Louisiana College. Some may suggest that because I am not a card-carrying member of the Louisiana Baptist Convention, I have no right to say anything about the subject (it’s happened before). But these decisions do affect me and everyone else who pays taxes in the State of Louisiana. Remember, Louisiana College offers its students an array of taxpayer subsidized loans and scholarships, and remember also, that one of the two “draft” reports somehow “stolen” and “leaked” to The Town Talk suggested Louisiana College would be requesting a donation of approximately $66 million for its campus and necessary renovations from the State of Louisiana, an enormous sum of money for a State currently plagued by massive cuts and deficiencies in its own public education system.

It’s almost impossible to have an honest conversation with someone who believes criticism is evil or the devil’s work.  In an academic environment, particularly one rooted in Christian principles, people should not be encouraged to wage war against those who disagree with them; they should be taught how to broker peace and understand human empathy. Louisiana College has never been “under attack.” People, primarily alumni, have publicly questioned the recent decisions made by the college’s leadership, beginning famously with Aguillard’s appointment as President by an ad-hoc selection committee formed by LC Board members. From the Associated Baptist Press, January 18, 2005:

As trustees met for more than four hours, mostly behind closed doors, about 250 students and others marched on the campus with signs opposing Aguillard. Meanwhile, a smaller group of supporters wore yellow tags supporting him. Earlier the faculty voted 53-12 to oppose Aguillard.

The embattled school already is on probation from its accrediting agency for issues of academic freedom. Now it faces a lawsuit over Aguillard’s nomination and election.

The alumni and former faculty members who filed a lawsuit last week claim the new president’s election violates the school’s bylaws because he was not nominated by the original search committee. Trustees appointed a special committee Jan. 6 to bring Aguillard’s name before the board for a vote.

The original search committee was replaced after its first choice, seminary professor Malcolm Yarnell of Fort Worth, Texas, turned down the job two months after accepting it. The committee offered it’s second choice, New Orleans seminary professor Stan Norman, but was rebuffed by other trustees, who appointed a new committee.

For many, the way in which the Louisiana College Board dismissed the concerns of hundreds of students, the vast and overwhelming majority of faculty members, and countless alumni seemed antithetical to the college’s commitment and mission; the decision to bypass its own established rules for selecting a President was the subject of a protracted lawsuit.

The criticism is not being promulgated or promoted by people who want to destroy Louisiana College; the criticism is from people who love Louisiana College. Once upon a time, not too terribly long ago, you didn’t have to explain your allegiance to a memo written eleven years ago by a group of Baptist ministers to qualify for a teaching position. Once upon a time, Louisiana College welcomed Methodists and Muslims, not because they sought to “lead them to Christ,” but because they sought to provide them first and foremost with a rigorous education. And once upon a time, you didn’t have to be a Southern Baptist or even a graduate of Louisiana College to be accepted as a supporter.

Update IThe Baptist Message, as it turns out, did not completely scrub President Aguillard’s editorial, as was stated in the original post and headline; they migrated the editorial to a different page. Currently, it is very difficult to search for the editorial on their website. Baptist Message editor Kelly Boggs states that he is aware of this problem, and they hope to upgrade the site soon.

Update II: If you’ve managed to read this entire post, then it should be clear: I am not and would never “attack” President Aguillard for his stances on abortion or homosexuality. I understand and respect his beliefs and his right to express and hold those beliefs. I brought up his statements on those issues simply to highlight certain factual errors.

24 thoughts

  1. Oh and “It’s almost impossible to have an honest conversation with someone who believes criticism is evil or the devil’s work”
    AMEN! Don’t question anything or ask for clarification…that just means you are rebellious and don’t want to conform to “God’s Will”…..

  2. They have major problems and unless there is a radical change in the administration, Louisiana College will stagnate.
    As Perpetualrenovator said:
    “It’s almost impossible to have an honest conversation with someone who believes criticism is evil or the devil’s work”

    Alex

  3. Mr. White-
    While there were and are many people who wanted Louisiana College to maintain the status quo seven years ago, there were many more who wanted a change – and who currently support the change that was made. You say that you “love” Louisiana College, however you only “love” Louisiana College should it align with your views. You might charge me with the same criticism. I have heard you, personally belittle and dismiss Louisiana College – you did it to my face. That doesn’t bother me. You have every right not to like it, not to support it, to want it to align with you views. However, I find it insincere to pretend as if you are pro-Louisiana College.

    As far as the Town Talk goes – I don’t think it’s some kind of Glenn Beck satanic conspiracy. It’s a fact, according to two reporters who are still employed at the Town Talk. A couple of editors and a couple of reporters have made it their mission to discredit the institution to a point, that the Louisiana Baptist Convention is forced to remove Dr. Aguillard. According to these two reporters, the Town Talk alledgedly wants to see the wrong righted from 2004 (the selection of Dr. Aguillard as president).

    Again, bravo for the cause, but don’t pretend this is all happenstance and people just doing the good work of journalism. It’s a concerted effort that started about a year ago with a couple of editors and reporters corresponding with some of the forum members of the now defunct “Save Our LC.” It was a planned, concerted effort.

    Again, I don’t begrudge anyone their point of view, but when we’re talking about honesty – let’s be honest. Let’s be honest about our motive, let’s be transparent, and let’s move forward. We may never agree in forward progress, but at least we know where each other stands.

    1. As an update: Heath and I just had an extended conversation on the phone.

      I want to make it clear: I never “belittled” or “dismissed” Louisiana College to him. Heath was referring to an extended conversation we had over six years ago, back when we were both in college. I cannot recall the entire conversation, and Heath also does not remember when or where it took place. But we spoke about psychology and religion and about how our own religious beliefs inform our understanding of human psychology. Our conversation was not about Louisiana College as an institution. I know Heath will corroborate this.

      I earnestly appreciate Heath’s willingness to discuss this with me personally, because, frankly, when I read his comments this morning, I was a little baffled.

      We may disagree on a few key issues, but I know, without a doubt, Heath is an ardent and earnest supporter of Louisiana College. I also believe he means what he says when he writes about the need for increased honesty and transparency, and as one of the youngest members of the LC Board, he is uniquely capable and (I believe) committed to ensuring those are not just empty words.

      Again, I sincerely thank him for being open and candid with me and for his willingness to correct the record.

  4. Sorry for the additonal post, but I did write the letter posted on the other local blog. I haven’t read it to make sure nothing has been changed, but I don’t know why it would be. However, if you would like, I would be more than happy to send you a copy. I know it’s lengthy, but I think it accurately reflects my views.

  5. Mr. White,

    Thank you for subscribing to the Baptist Message. On behalf of our staff, thank you.

    Let me apologize for the confusing nature of our search feature. It is less than ideal & I agree with a previous post that said it was crazy. I have to utilize it frequently & it can be frustrating. We hope to upgrade in the future – hopefully sooner rather than later.

    Mr. White, with all the previous stated, I would hope you would change the headline for this particular post. It seems, given the facts, to be misleading.

    Respectfully,

    Kelly Boggs, Editor
    Baptist Message

    1. Thank you, Kelly. If you’re going to claim to “fact-check” someone else, you should probably have your own facts right. Although the editorial was migrated to a different page and is almost impossible to find (even on Google), the Baptist Message did not “scrub” the editorial, as I had originally claimed. Either way, despite the original headline, the purpose of this post was never to single out the Baptist Message; obviously, it is concerned with a multitude of issues. In other words, the headline never really fit the story anyway.

      As one of your newest subscribers, I also thank you for your courtesy and understanding.

  6. Firstly, I would like to apologize to Mr. White for any undue mischaracterizations of his character or unique intention. After our conversation, I realized I mis-percieved our conversation over six years ago. While we may disagree on certain issues, he certainly evidenced wholehearted support for Louisiana College – the institution – and its students, and its relevance to Central Louisiana. I apologize for the mis-perception and how it may have affected Mr. White. My intention was never to call his character into question, but for everyone – on all sides – to have a open, honest, and completely transparent discussion about Louisiana College. I am grateful for the opportunity Mr. White allowed for me to correct myself and further clarify my response.

  7. Before we get too carried away with these commendations, I’d like to refocus this dialogue to the main issue: the Louisiana College financial situation. The fact is, the College is worse off financially than it was six years ago. According to the 990s, the College has more than 20 million in commitments. This is an increase of nearly 5 million since 2008. Some have interpreted the statements such that the College has had a number of deficits within the six year window.

    Meanwhile, a partial stadium stands; roofs with visible patches leak; the grounds are in neglect; and a half dozen or more projects and programs go unfunded.

    I will not allow theology to crowd my point; this criticism is not about the Bible, it is about higher education management. From all indicators, Louisiana College is in need of bold, new leadership–one with realistic program ideas and a transparent financial report.

    1. Although I wish I could agree with Baptist Higher Education when he (she) said “I will not allow theology to crowd my point; this criticism is not about the Bible, it is about higher education management.” I am afraid, in my view, this is not the case. Yes, the financial situation is a real problem. As is the ever increasing reports of declining quality of education. And fear among both faculty and students of being “disloyal” if anything is said remotely out of step with Aguillard. Sorry, but all of this falls back on a perverted theology out line with historical Baptist thinking. Aguillard is attempting to create a theocracy based on his warped world view, justified by a destructive theology.

      1. Yes, you are correct in that facet; but we can’t win that argument with the theological right in SBC life. By asserting a belief in abolute innerancy they have forever positioned themselves on the high ground. That established, I focus on something in John’s gospel the chapter in which Jesus challenges the Pharisees to evaluate his works, to which they replied, “We are reacting to your words.” This crew at LC needs to be held accountable as to how their works (the management of the College) mesh with their espoused worldview. The fact is this is bad leadership. Lowered standards; debt; internal turmoil; threats; and so on. As Joel C. Gregory says in his book on this great theological battle, the fundamentalists must always have an enemy, whether within or without or even if one must be created.

        What amazes me is the old leadership which, in reality, wasn’t liberal at all, had a much better list of works: good reputation; high standards; and good financials. And yet this “salvation story” is spun by so many, including a poster above, that they were Bible hating, faith wrecking heretics. What a lie.

  8. I am so pleased that Mr. Veuleman saw fit to apologize to Lamar for his mischaracterization of Lamar’s feelings towards Louisiana College. It shows something we don’t often see in our public discourse nowadays – civility, and an ability to admit one was wrong.

    That being said, it seems apparent to all but Mr. Aguillard’s supporters that Mr. Aguillard seems more interested in casting aspersions on his critics and the plight of our society as a means to deflect criticism of his stewardship of what was once a fine institution of higher education.

    I fervently hope and pray that Mr. Veuleman will now realize that, in the words of Baptist Higher Education above, “Louisiana College is in need of bold, new leadership–one with realistic program ideas and a transparent financial report.”

  9. Creating imaginary enemies can stir up the base to maximize contributions. If lots of folks out there are attacking LC, Aguillard’s supporters might be convinced to loosen up their checkbooks. It’s a time proven technique.

    Law school and a Med School are likewise implausible for this podunk Bible college, but Aguillard is always moving forward. Never let reality kill your dreams. There are lots of big time donors out there willing to shell out the big bucks, you just have to find out what it takes to get their $.

  10. I wonder how many heads will roll because this was written? How many will lose their jobs, wrongly, because truth has been printed?

  11. I’m hoping this board which meets this week will put the administration and the President on notice. I would be thrilled to see a dismissal. And a reinstatement of some who have perished beneath this regime.

  12. I am a father of a student at LC, I assure you I am not the eloquent writer most of you appear to be. Here is my opinion, repairs need to be made to school before any expansion takes place. The girls dorm has major leaks, the building where the science programs are taught are also in dire need of repair. Somebody needs to address the students with facts, several are considering transferring at the end of this current semester. I don’t know this Dr. A person from anyone else at LC but if he is failing to lead the Southern Baptist Convention needs to rid themselves of this particular individual. I know several alumni who refuse to comment on Dr. A and I can only assume they have nothing nice to say. One more thing, why is the football program so important to LC?

  13. I think Aguillard might be on to something. I have drink enough beer with Billy Gunn to confirm that he is indeed in league with the devil.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s