CenLamar

Update: The bill doesn’t necessarily target bloggers who are being paid– as much as it does those, like Kos, who can raise more than 25K a quarter. So let’s think about this a little bit: If someone like Kos can instantly raise a candidate thousands of dollars, I would think that one could argue that he is lobbying for that candidate. The initial reporting on this story was sloppy, due, in part to the analysis offered by Chad Rogers, who wrote about the legislation (and Vitter’s involvement) earlier today on The Dead Pelican. It turns out that Rogers’s fears about the scope of this legislation are probably unfounded. The guys over at Wonkette are freaking out about this story, comparing the legislation to Nazi-like suppression of free speech. C’mon. This seems to be primarily aimed at people who can raise thousands and thousands of dollars for a candidate– and holding those people to the same standards we hold other lobbyists.

According to GrassrootsFreedom.com, Congress is considering legislation that would require bloggers with readerships of over 500 people to register as lobbyists– or potentially face criminal charges.

Our very own Senator David Vitter introduced an amendment to the legislation in order to “to create criminal penalties, including up to one year in jail, if someone ‘knowingly and willingly fails to file or report.’” However, according to Information Weekly, Vitter’s now retracted his position and done a complete reversal. And now he’s saying that he’s been misunderstood– that the amendment was supposed to single out “public officials.” You can read the amendment and judge for yourself right here.

Information Weekly explains the legislation:

Section 220 of S. 1, the lobbying reform bill currently before the Senate, would require grassroots causes, even bloggers, who communicate to 500 or more members of the public on policy matters, to register and report quarterly to Congress the same as the big K Street lobbyists. Section 220 would amend existing lobbying reporting law by creating the most expansive intrusion on First Amendment rights ever. For the first time in history, critics of Congress will need to register and report with Congress itself,” according to a statement from GrassRootsFreedom.com.

So, here’s the question: Does this only hold the blog owner’s accountable? Or does it include all bloggers who “communicate to 500 or more members of the public”?

Or is everyone misreading everything?

Others contend that the bill specifically targets people who have been paid to blog for a particular cause or candidate and that there’s no reason for the “average blogger” to be alarmed by this legislation.