Revisiting the Sports Arena And Other Observations…

Revisiting the Sports Arena And Other Observations on Alexandria’s Future

(Warning: Rant Alert)

Way back on August 2nd, the Town Talk published an article about plans to build a multi-use sports arena near the Pineville Expressway. The proposed site is eligible for Superfund money, because it is currently listed as a public health hazard (and has been on the EPA’s national priority list since 1999).

The Superfund program is administered by the Environmental Protection Agency.

At the time, most of us dismissed the need for such a facility, pointing out that Alexandria already has a multi-use facility in the Rapides Parish Coliseum and that the City should be focusing on other projects instead.

But perhaps in our haste to form a consensus, we missed a crucial point: This site has been deemed environmentally hazardous, and it needs to be cleaned up. Indeed, this need has been nationally documented for nearly seven years. And what’s more, the federal government will literally give us money to redevelop and clean up the site.

There’s a reason I’m revisiting this issue. The City of Alexandria is currently attempting to convince the Southwestern Athletic Conference to locate their headquarters here. We’re competing against several other Southern cities, including Shreveport, Houston, Dallas, Jackson, and Birmingham. During this process, it is important for Alexandrians to recognize that this “bid war” is indicative of the type of competition we are up against all the time, and although our location represents one key asset, our lack of facilities ultimately may prove to be our own undoing. From today’s Town Talk:

“Some cities don’t want to host everything,” Sharp said. “Shreveport has great facilities…. They possibly would be able to host championships in all 18 sports that we offer.”

At least initially, Shreveport appears to be a viable contender among the bidders: the SWAC wants 20,000 to 25,000 square feet of office space for its 12 employees, roughly $400,000 a year from local businesses and use of area sports venues for its conference championships.

I believe that our new airport has set the standard for Central Louisiana’s future, and as such, it is critical to complement our airport with other activities and facilities that add to our overall quality of life. Many believe that Alexandria should instead be focusing its attention toward the construction and development of a riverfront marina, which is perceived to be a more important project. But such an opinion (which I once held) is based on the assumption that Alexandria is only capable of doing one thing at a time. It undermines our ingenuity, our resourcefulness, and our ability to multi-task.

The only way Alexandria will grow effectively and become competitive in attracting jobs, events, tourists, and industry is if we’re all on the same page. There are some hard truths we must all recognize:

  • Our workforce is getting older.
  • We’re having an incredibly tough time attracting and retaining young people.
  • Cities like Shreveport and Lafayette are competing for the same jobs, conventions, and events. And they’re doing a better job than we are.
  • If we only grow one way, we’ll be starving off the rest of our city for years.
  • There are several influential opinion-leaders in Alexandria who undermine efforts at inclusive growth by wrongly insisting that “value” is limited to a certain area of town. (This is perhaps our greatest stumbling block– convincing those leaders and businesspeople that their opinions represent an antiquated understanding of the ways in which 21st century American cities must grow in order to remain competitive).

Pardon me for being a young know-it-all punk, but we need to face reality. If Alexandria can’t attract and retain young people and if we can’t recognize that we’re only as good as our worst neighborhood, then it won’t matter how nice our airport is– we’ll still be suffering.

Last week, I referenced an article from the NY Times about cities competing over the “cool factor.” The “cool factor” may scare some people here. But it’s important to remember that cities create their own individual definition of “cool.” What’s cool in Portland or Providence or Austin may not work here in Alexandria. So we’ll need to figure out what will work.

And that’s where the blogosphere can play a role.

I understand that some people don’t believe in downtown revitalization. They think it is a waste of taxpayers’ money; they believe that the City shouldn’t invest in “dying neighborhoods.” (Strange and selfish logic). In case it’s not already obvious, I completely and totally disagree with those who dismiss downtown. And there are plenty of good reasons:

  • Downtown cannot be replaced by a “new area.” Some people, including the Town Talk, are calling 28-West the “new downtown.” In my opinion, this reflects a fundamental misunderstanding of what downtown really is. It is the home of our great institutions- banks, churches, and courthouses- and these institutions do not simply pack up and move to another area of town just because of a new, handsome subdivision.
  • Downtown Alexandria is centrally located and on the Red River. (It’s inherently valuable property).
  • Downtown Alexandria is intuitive. It’s walk-able. It’s a reflection of the basic principles of smart growth.
  • It contains many of our most historical and architecturally significant buildings.
  • And most importantly, thriving downtowns attract industry and young professionals. I’ve said this before, but it bears repeating: When a visitor arrives in Alexandria, their impression of our overall health is based on two things: our airport, which is awesome, and our downtown, which is struggling but emerging.

Responses

  1. Anonymous Avatar

    Lamar,

    One critical thing that is common to most all downtowns including ours is that they are the core of the original settlements. Their locations were chosen because of access to transportation…usually a river, railroad, or major roadway. They also are typically located on some of the best land. Ever wonder why the french quarter didn’t flood during Katrina. Alexandria is no different. Our downtown is where it all started. No fancy brick gated subdivisions or shiny glass buildings can change that.

  2. Anonymous Avatar

    Lamar, I sense that you and Roy represent an unfortunate ageist mentality which is reflected in all of your writing and in Roy’s prospective appointments. I understand not liking gray or wrinkled folks but I am affraid that, along with being unfair and unwise, you and Roy will spend a lot of time reinventing the wheel.

  3. Lamar White, Jr. Avatar

    What on earth are you talking about?

    Ageism?

    By the way, I wrote this, not Mr. Roy.

    I’m talking about ensuring our shared future and sustained growth.

    I’m talking about preserving our history and our character.

    My argument that we must do more to attract and retain young people is not a slam against older people; that’s absurd.

    We need young people because in ten years from now two workers will be retiring for every one who is entering the workforce– simple demographics– and a reality that other cities have already recognized.

    No one is trying to reinvent the wheel here. There are already proven and established methods and examples to follow by.

    ———

    And how do you know who Jacques’s appointments are? How do you know what age demographic they reflect?

    What if I were to tell you that 90% of the prospective appointees are at least ten years older than Jacques? Would that change your mind?

    There’s absolutely no need to be afraid.

    This discussion is about how to make Alexandria a better place to live.

    And considering that step one calls for inclusiveness, no one will be shut out from the process.

  4. Anonymous Avatar

    myopia
    One entry found for myopia.
    Main Entry: my·o·pia
    Pronunciation: mI-‘O-pE-&
    Function: noun
    Etymology: New Latin, from Greek myOpia, from myOp-, myOps
    1 : a condition in which the visual images come to a focus in front of the retina of the eye resulting especially in defective vision of distant objects
    2 : a lack of foresight or discernment : a narrow view of something
    – my·o·pic /-‘O-pik, -‘ä-/ adjective
    – my·o·pi·cal·ly /-pi-k(&-)lE/ adverb

  5. Lamar White, Jr. Avatar

    Myopia is a good word to inject into this discussion.

    And it’s precisely what we should be battling against.

    It would be myopic, for example, if we did not look toward demographic trends, like the age of our workforce, in determining ways in which we must plan for our future.

    It would be myopic to assume that simply because something has not been done means that it cannot be done.

    It would be myopic (and defeatist) to believe that Alexandria’s downtown is dead and has no chance of revitalization.

    It would be myopic to believe that we can grow in one direction without harming other areas.

    And it would be myopic to continue to follow the trends of suburban sprawl when alternative growth methods have proven to be more effective for 21st century American cities.

  6. Anonymous Avatar

    Yes the site does offer opportunity with funding from Brownfield grants and Brownfield credits – however, the neighborhood has a say in the development. The people want something that creates JOBS. Sports arenas create temporary jobs.

    The better site for the arena would be North MacArthur, leading to most of the hotels and offering the opportunity to clean up one of the gateways into the City and providing a REASON for people to exit MacArthur Drive. The old drive- in site, combined with some additional property which can be purchased would make a much more attractive site.

    The old KCS site and adjoining creostote plant could be put back into a service as a full-serice warehousing complex, utilizing the existing rail. Cotton Storage can be dressed up to make it more attractive.

    This concept resolves two issues – the lack of warehouse space in the community & creates jobs for the neighborhood. Additionally it would help to create a northern gateway off MacArthur.

  7. Margaret Waring Avatar

    Lamar- Do you know the status of ownership of Ruston Foundry property? The EPA site states: “the facility began operations in 1908 but has been inactive since 1985 due to adjudication by the Rapides Parish Tax Assessor’s office for unpaid taxes”, but it doesn’t mention current ownership. The contaminants of principal concern are lead and antimony, and offsite disposal of +/- 1,800 cubic yards of the worst soil is recommended.

    With the downtown portion of I-49 came the landscaping and walking trails funded by DOTD. Although you don’t see people using the trails, the project does help mitigate the negative visual effect of the highway. It seems to me that, at least for the short term, the Ruston Foundry site could be made into an attractive park space, utilizing best principles of phytoremediation to remove contaminants from the soil (following physical removal of the most heavily contaminated soils). Nature is the best waste manager we have, and plants could be growing and cleaning the property until there is consensus on what the best use of the site really is. Perhaps a downtown botanical park is a valid use in itself. A natural water treatment pond with specially selected vegetation could be an aesthetic asset as well as a cost-effective method of contaminent remediation. In addition to the passive recreational opportunities a park would afford in that neighborhood, other communities have effectively developed such projects into successful environmental classrooms.

    While I admit I am not a big sports fan, the idea of a big arena and parking lot in that particular location just seems wrong. It would create a somewhat sterile, fenced off property that had little activity between scheduled events. It would serve to continue the separation of the Lower 3rd side of town from our downtown rather than encourage pedestrians to cross under I-49 to take advantage of our arts district activities and other services.

  8. Pawpaw Avatar

    Lamar.

    Most of what you say is correct.

    However, the thing that galls me, and it is just a tiny issue, is with you mistaking the new terminal for the airport.

    The airport hasn’t changed except for the opening of the new terminal.

    We do not have a new airport. The airport is all that other stuff out there, lights, runways, hangars, grass, etc. It’s pretty much the same old airport that the Air Force built.

  9. wesawthat... Avatar

    we agree with ms. waring.

  10. Chronos Avatar

    Do the plans for the sports arena include converting it to a baseball field? If not, why not make a complex that includes a baseball field (new home for the Aces = frequent usage during the summer), in addition to the indoor arena?

    Creating a sports complex downtown also would help the hotel/convention business downtown. How about including a street car service on 3rd St. between the Holiday Inn/Bentley and the proposed site for the arena (perhaps further down 3rd to B’way, to the Mall, too)?

    Sports complexes can dominate an area of a city further stimulating other businesses, whether they be retail, restaurants, or hotels. This sounds like an excellent idea.

  11. wesawthat... Avatar

    the point some seem to be missing is that the site is a toxic waste dump. the city cant even find someone competent enough to design and build a simple building – (couglin-saunders) do you really trust these people to detoxify this site? do you think its a good idea to spend time there or have your children spending time there?

  12. Lamar White, Jr. Avatar

    Don’t get me wrong, I’m not sure that a sports arena is the best possible use for the site, and I agree with the poster who said it would probably only create temporary jobs.

    My initial point in bringing up the sports arena notion was to demonstrate how other towns, like Shreveport, can offer facilities we cannot, which may put us at a competitive disadvantage.

    Also, to PawPaw, thank you for correcting my mistake. You’re right: It’s a new TERMINAL not a new airport.

  13. Lamar White, Jr. Avatar

    Margaret, I’ll try to find out more for you. Hopefully, someone will come forward with some information.

  14. Margaret Waring Avatar

    Somehow the blogosphere ate my second response just now… I wanted to assure wesawthat that EPA would monitor any contracts entered into for Superfund site cleanup. There are experienced environmental engineering firms capable of handling the problems at Ruston Foundry. Many landscape architects with specialized education on sustainability methods including phytoremediation are also assisting with these types of projects. There are many creative possibilities for fixing the environmental woes prior to or concurrent with site development.

  15. Anonymous Avatar

    Actually after doing a quick check of the records with the Clerk of Court, the property held under the name of Ruston Foundry is adjudicated to the City of Alexandria for property taxes, not the parish. This was done in 1988. So technically the City owns the property.

    EPA actually offers grants to municipalities and private industries for cleanup and would continue to monitor any site that had been deemed a superfund site.

    EPA and DEQ require that when a “cleaning” is determined a level must be determined as well and the neighborhood surrounding must be in agreement. Again, the neighborhood wants jobs and has agreed to “clean” to commercial or industrial standards, as opposed to residential standards. They have specifically stated they do not want parks and green space. They need jobs in their neighborhood.

  16. Anonymous Avatar

    Lamar,

    It is amusing to read most of your posts. They are very “youth centered.” Reminds me of those in my generation that touted the Coliseum as being a “big draw.” Or a recent group that thought CowBoy Town would initiate the development of Rapides Station.

    I don’t see either development as having had any long term traction. Just as I don’t see the revitalization of downtown in your lifetime.

  17. Lamar White, Jr. Avatar

    I don’t think the Coliseum or Cowboy Town is at all comparable to the task of downtown revitalization.

  18. Anonymous Avatar

    There is very little left downtown of historic significants. All of the old regal structures were torn down, like he old city hall, the old courthouse, Hub City Hardware, the American and the European Hotels, the Paramount, so that there is barely a vestige of the old downtown charm you like to promote. There are a few old interesting structures but most of them are falling into disrepair and decay to a point where rescue is not likely. I have never seen a town with so little regard for it’s historic structures. The sprawling Town Talk sits on the graves of lovely old buildings. It’s too late for any meaningful preservation. Pineville has more historic buildings that Alexandria.

  19. Anonymous Avatar

    Nice to see the topic being discussed, again, Lamar. Good work.

    I wrote a letter to the Town Talk shortly after the article appeared, and the gist of my points were…

    1. The Superfund location is ill-suited… why? Well, the very term “environmentally unsafe” should raise red flags when considering a facility that would seat 10 to 12,000 people, you’d think. Secondly, it’s in an area of the city that, no matter how true or untrue, is viewed by the suburban-dwelling populace as a crime-riddled area. These are the people with the expendable income to go to concerts and sporting events at such an arena. Doomed to failure.

    2. The city has already (foolishly, in my opinion) sold off a chunk of 3rd Street to Rapides for their expansion. That being said, why not use the chunk of 3rd between the hospital and the Riverfront Center for an arena site? Think about it… an arena capable of hosting sporting events, concerts, large-scale trade shows, etc., would benefit froma proxmity to two large hotels, shops, restaurants, bars, etc. The arena would work well WITh the Riverfront Center adjacent to it, and the business brought to downtown via the arena would spill over into downtown coffers, as well.

    Rained out events (how many rained-out Riverfests/BBQfests, etc. do we need to cram into the Convention Hall??) would be more viable in a larger facility when necessary.

    Just my two cents.

    Ron Roberts
    ron@q93fm.com

  20. Drew Ward Avatar

    I’ve thought for years that that location would be an opportune spot for a multi-use sports arena. I have to say though that I too am skeptical about the project.

    I have faith in the fact that the area and market could support it. What I don’t have faith in is Alexandria and their regular version of doing everything half-assed.

    We have a huge history as a community of bringing in things to the community that help, but just a little. We really do need a facility like this. But, we don’t need another riverfront centre or some other small facility.

    Lamar is right — we are competing with Lafayette, Monroe, and Shreveport. If we’re going to ever compete we have to take a lesson from their playbooks and build something bigger and better than theirs.

    The ideal goal for this project should be a facility on par with the Cajundome in Lafayette. It’s the right size, it’s a stylish facility, and its a regular venue for sports, music, conventions, tradeshows, and festivals.

    We don’t need another small facility. We need something that gives people a reason to come to Alexandria.

    The poster who said that our downtown is lacking is right. It’s basicly be stripped of its soul in the race for MacArthur Dr. What we really need to do is take a hollistic approach to downtown dvelopment.

    We have one thing that can be a true advantage to us. We’re small. Normally most communities see that as a negative, but in our case it can help.

    We should be redeveloping downtown Alexandria as a convention community. Market all the facilities, restaurants and hotels together. A large, clean, safe multivenue location for conventions and trade.

    The arena is great idea. Of cource, riverboat gambling would have probably given us all the development we ever needed….but then again had we gone for that we might have ended up like poor, destitue, prosperous downtown shreveport…

    The city should take advantage of moves to clean up areas for redevelopment. We should also consider redeveloping the marshy area between I-49, Macarthur, and the River north of RRMC. That is an excellent location for a golf course.

    I know we already have 5 or 5 courses in the metro area. But, I bet you could sell the idea of a convention area (the entire downtown) with a golf course adjacent. There are already several places who market golf resorts for conventions, but how many of them can combine the benefits of a downtown metro location with the leisure of a golf club and (eventually) and active riverfront?

Leave a reply to Pawpaw Cancel reply