Skip to content

Archive for September, 2008

Naomi Klein Interviewed by Crooks and Liars: Shock Doctrine and the Wall Street Bailout

On Thursday, John Amato of Crooks and Liars interviewed Naomi Klein, author of the critically-acclaimed book The Shock Doctrine. Klein and Amato spoke about the proposed $700 billion Wall Street bailout bill and its potential political implications.

Klein’s basic thesis, as articulated in her book, is that economic conservatives (particularly those who subscribe to Milton Friedman’s theories) often use the shock of a disaster to implement free market “shock therapy,” which typically involves massive deregulation, large-scale privatization of government services (benefiting the wealthy at the expense of the middle class), and the elimination of social programs.

The interview runs a little less than 20 minutes, and though the audio is a little scratchy, it’s still worth hearing in its entireity.

Part One:

Part Two:

I wonder what Klein thinks about McCain’s statement that the government should consider a “spending freeze” (except for defense and veterans), because it certainly seems to fit nicely into the framework she sets up.

It’s also noteworthy, as Klein points out, that Obama’s healthcare plan (which has often been described by conservatives as exorbitantly expensive and maligned as “socialism”) would cost just as much as our unilateral and immediate bailout of the insurance giant AIG: $85 billion. Throughout my entire life, I’ve heard conservatives mock the notion of universal healthcare, often casting the idea as unrealistically expensive and burdensome. And yet, last week, without any debate or real discussion, taxpayers provided a private company $85 billion.

Suspending Fundraising?

By now, everyone has heard of John McCain’s decision to suspend his campaign, cease all advertisements and commercials, and halt his fundraising efforts until after the proposed $700 billion Wall Street bail-out bill is passed.

Problem is: Despite what’s being reported on other blogs and The Boston Globe, McCain hasn’t suspended fundraising. Quoting from The Boston Globe:

The McCain campaign clarified that in addition to suspending campaign events, it is also putting advertising and fundraising on hold.

To be sure, under public financing laws, McCain’s not exactly raising funds directly for his campaign; all donations go to his Campaign Compliance Fund, which helps him “defray legal and accounting costs,” the RNC, and the “Michigan, Missouri, Ohio, and Pennsylvania Republican Parties.”

Simply put, it’s a baldfaced lie to assert that McCain has ceased fundraising activities.

Next week’s fundraiser in California is still on as scheduled.

After all, if McCain is really suspending fundraising, then why is he still asking for contributions on his campaign website? Apparently, his wife was also raising money in Washington State today.

McCain’s campaign “suspension” appears to be nothing more than a media ploy.

A suspension, by definition, would require a temporary halt in all campaign activities. Synonyms for the word “suspension:”

1–3. intermission, interruption, discontinuance, cessation, abeyance, hiatus.

Otherwise, he’s simply changing his schedule, and with all the earned media attention he received as a result of this ploy, why would he need to advertise? It’s been wall-to-wall McCain campaign coverage all day long. Seriously.

Let’s not allow ourselves to be fooled: McCain hasn’t voted in the Senate since April. Today’s Washington Post/ ABC poll shows a nine point lead for Obama nationwide. And we now know the House is very close to a compromise bill- 98% complete. Here’s a draft of the summary of the compromise bill.

Frankly, the notion that this requires us to delay Friday’s Presidential debate is absurd, and now, more than ever, we need to hear a thorough discussion of the issues from the two men who would like to be our next President.

NYT Excoriates Louisiana for Gustav Evacuation

An editorial in today’s New York Times entitled “‘Never Again,’ Again“:

Hurricane Gustav gave the state of Louisiana a test for which it had three years to prepare. There were thousands of poor, sick, disabled and elderly people who could not get out on their own. They needed to be rescued with dispatch, and sheltered in safety and dignity.

One simple test. The state flunked.

It’s shameful, really, that anyone would want to excuse or ignore this. Only a week after Gustav made landfall in Louisiana, LSUS Professor Jeffrey Sadow published a piece on his blog, which is widely circulated among other conservative websites, entitled “Whiners Demand More Luxurious State-Run Shelters.” Quoting from Sadow’s blog:

Chances are the vast majority of the non-infirm who got free rides and accommodations as a result of the evacuation from the state government are entirely used to government handouts and not only expect them, they demand them whether they lift a finger ever to deserve such rewards from Americans who work and who through the goodness of their hearts allow taxes to be levied on them to pay for these others’ lifestyle choices. These ingrates have a better life than some of our troops, for example, who work and sleep in scorching heat, with no bathroom or showers for days on end, and facing lethal force on top it all – any many of them probably make less in regular pay than the abled complainers get from government for doing nothing.

Sadow apparently saw the legitimate complaints about the conditions of shelters as an opportunity to express his indignation at the hypothetical possibility that most of these families rely on other government assistance and “handouts.” And, perhaps most offensively, he attempts to compare the conditions of our troops in the battlefield in order to argue that, hey, things could be worse. Sadow’s disdain for the poor prevents him from recognizing the obvious: Without an evacuation plan that includes individuals and families who could not otherwise evacuate, we would be leaving those Americans in harm’s way. And without an evacuation strategy that treats those individuals and families with even a modicum of dignity (ensuring, for example, they have adequate restroom facilities), those Americans will be less inclined to evacuate.

Back to the Times editorial (bold mine):

Evacuees said they had had no idea where they were going; bus drivers would not tell them. When they arrived, there were not enough portable toilets, and no showers. For five days there was no way to bathe, except with bottled water in filthy outdoor toilets. Privacy in the vast open space — 1,000 people to a warehouse, shoulder-to-shoulder on cots — was nonexistent. The mood among evacuees was grim, surrounded as they were by police officers and the National Guard, with no visitors or reporters allowed.

“We didn’t want to evacuate into a prison,” Lethia Brooks told the New Orleans Workers’ Center for Racial Justice, an organization that accompanied the evacuees, inspected the shelters and collected hundreds of stories into a report sharply critical of the state’s response.

Gustav ended up being no Katrina, and the week of suffering was not as severe as the deathly mayhem of three years ago. But residents had every right to expect far better treatment than they received. After a week of indignities in crowded, unsanitary shelters, many returned home with their fragile finances in turmoil. They had been forced to buy extra basics while out of their homes, and September rent was due.

The secretary of Louisiana’s Department of Social Services, which was responsible for the shelters, resigned after this scandal and one involving problems with food stamp distribution.

Now, many poor residents are vowing “never again,” as in, “Never again will we get on the bus to be warehoused. We’ll ride out the next storm.” In New Orleans, disaster is never far away, and government incompetence cannot be allowed to undermine a swift, sure evacuation. Gov. Bobby Jindal’s administration should move quickly on a better plan that does not expose the poor to differential, substandard treatment.

No one doubts the hard work and the sacrifice of the men and women in the Louisiana Department of Social Services, and I don’t think anyone would blame the individual men and women with the results of the poor planning that resulted in so many people being subjected to those conditions. This shouldn’t be used as an opportunity to scapegoat.

And lest anyone think the New York Times is being hyperbolic, consider this article in The Shreveport Times:

“It was an eye-opener,” said state Rep. Patrick Williams, D-Shreveport, who described the smell of urine, filthy, limited restroom facilities and evacuees lying on cots suffering in hot, stagnant rooms at one shelter. “When you walk in expecting one thing and then you see what you see — that’s really what got us. (Evacuees) understood this was an emergency, but if they could get clean and be comfortable, I think it would have been a lot more comfortable (at the shelters).”

Conditions at state-run shelters not only were criticized by local officials but also by faith-based groups and a New Orleans advocacy group that led the Thursday protest. The group maintained DSS policy of sending critical transportation needs evacuees to state-run shelters was differential and prejudicial.

“Across Louisiana, the poor people, who are still suffering, were evacuated to disgusting, inhumane conditions like this,” said Saket Soni, New Orleans Workers’ Center for Racial Justice spokesman.

The Shreveport Times also attempts to uncover who, exactly, is to blame (though no one can agree):

Even so, officials disagreed who should shoulder the blame for shelter conditions.

Cooper points to lease contracts for the buildings negotiated under former Gov. Kathleen Blanco’s administration as one reason. Under the agreements, the owners of the former mall on Greenwood Road receive about $42,000 monthly. The state pays $30,000 a month for the Jewella property.

Both leases commenced in June 2007 and are three- or five-year contracts, said Sandy Davis.

Davis did not know if the state made monthly or lump sum payments to the landlords. However, the annual cost for the leases is about $504,000 for the former outlet mall and about $360,000 for the former Sam’s Club. So far, the leases have cost at least $1.08 million.

Caddo Parish tax assessor records show the outlet mall is owned by Professional Properties of Shreveport, LLC, of Irvine, Calif., which purchased the property in October 2005 for $550,000.

Investment Properties of America paid $2.75 million in April 2007 for the former Sam’s Club, according to Caddo Parish clerk of court records.

Cooper and others were at a loss to explain why the Greenwood shelter — which, along with the Jewella facility, was inspected in August by Williamson and State Police Col. Michael D. Edmonson and determined to be adequate — did not have air conditioning. On-site restrooms at both were minimal and did not include showers. Evaluating those leases, which were not available for inspection, would be a priority in the coming weeks, Cooper said.

Obama Within Seven Points in Louisiana; McCain’s Net Loss is Ten Points Since Last Poll

According to the latest American Research Group poll:

This represents an 10-11 point net drop in support for McCain and at least a five point net gain for Obama in Louisiana, since the last Rasmussen poll one month ago.

H/t to Ryan at The Daily Kingfish.

KALB: Hurricane Gustav: The Storm After the Storm

H/t to WST

The entire team at KALB did an incredible job covering and reporting on Hurricane Gustav.

Kudos to the entire news station.

Register!

ONLY 18 DAYS LEFT TO REGISTER!!!

Just a note to everyone:  under Louisiana Law you must be registered to vote a full 30 days prior to any election you wish to vote in.  So, with 48 days left until the Nov 4th Presidential Elections that means there are only 18 days left to register.

That means that Friday, October 3rd is the last day to complete your registration.

I suggest doing so sooner lest your votes not be counted.  Even if you have registered previously you may have been automatically deregistered without your knowledge for a variety of administrative reasons.  Contact your local registrar of voters to verify your registration status:

You may register by mail or by filling out a quick application at the nearest location of the following:

  • Louisiana Department of Motor Vehicle offices
  • Louisiana Department of Social Services offices and WIC offices, Food Stamp offices, and Medicaid offices
  • Offices serving persons with disabilities, such as the Deaf Action Centers and Independent Living offices
  • Armed Forces Recruitment offices

** Did you notice that last one — Military Recruiters, any of their offices which almost never have a line.

Finally, if you are registered, don’t forget you have the option of voting early.

From the Secretary of State’s office:

Early Voting, In Person (R.S. 18:1303)

YOU DO NOT NEED A REASON TO VOTE EARLY!  All voters may vote early, just like they are voting on Election Day.

Voters who want to vote early for any election may do so in person at their parish Registrar of Voters office from fourteen days to seven days prior to any scheduled election.  Refer to the Schedule of Elections for early voting time periods for upcoming elections.

When you go to your parish Registrar of Voters office to cast your vote, be sure to take a driver’s license, a Louisiana Special ID, or some other generally recognized picture ID.  The Registrars will open from 8:30 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. for each day of early voting.

McCain Campaign: Umm… He Created the BlackBerry?

I only bring this up because of my previous post about McCain’s “computer illiteracy.”

You just can’t make this kind of stuff up. From Politico:

Asked what work John McCain did as chairman of the Senate Commerce Committee that helped him understand the financial markets, the candidate’s top economic adviser wielded visual evidence: his BlackBerry.

“He did this,” Douglas Holtz-Eakin told reporters this morning, holding up his BlackBerry.  “Telecommunications of the United States is a premier innovation in the past 15 years, comes right through the Commerce Committee. So you’re looking at the miracle John McCain helped create and that’s what he did.”

Apparently, Senator McCain also thinks this is absurd:

A senior aide to Mr. McCain, Matt McDonald later said that Mr. McCain “laughed” when he heard the comment, according to a pool report. “He would not claim to be the inventor of anything, much less the BlackBerry,’’ he said. “This was obviously a boneheaded joke by a staffer.”

The original BlackBerrys were made by a Canadian company, Research in Motion.

Problem is: Holtz-Eakin wasn’t joking, though he is obviously bone-headed.

Offensive Letter #1

Throughout the next two months, I will attempt to provide a counter-argument against the most egregiously partisan and most factually inaccurate letters approved for publication in our local paper of record The Town Talk. I begin this morning with a refutation of George Bennett, Sr’s letter entitled “McCain a man of integrity.”

Quoting:

Were it not for the pitiful ignorance and utter stupidity of many American citizens, the 2008 presidential election would be fodder for a Hollywood comedy — a belly-laughing hilarious satire. Snoop Dog (sp) and Bruce Willis could play the major roles.

Mr. Bennett is suggesting that if only we all weren’t so stupid and ignorant, then we would be able to recognize how much better the Presidential race would be as a major motion picture, as long as it was a comedy starring Snoop Dog (sp; Dogg is spelled with the double g) as Barack Obama and Bruce Willis as John McCain. (Note to George: Next time, proofread for clarity, unless you’re actually, purposely attempting to offend the entire nation).

To be honest, I can’t envision Snoop and Bruce starring in the same movie, but it is pretty obvious what Mr. Bennett is implying: Snoop Dogg (with all due respect to him) is, in Mr. Bennett’s view, the archetype of the popular, superficial “gangsta,” a persona can that appeal universally but is ultimately a “bad actor,” whereas Bruce Willis is the soft-spoken white guy “hero”.

In case you were wondering, yes, I find the whole construction incredibly offensive, narrow-minded, and one step short of racist (though I am sure others will rightfully disagree with me and say that he’s two steps ahead).

Just think — and I know that’s quite a challenge for some of you liberals — about what the Greatest Generation must think about how their election is being manipulated by the mainstream (leftist) media.

On one hand, the Democrats audaciously presented their voters with the choice of an ex-hippie (sp) pot-smoking (sp) socialist (sp) anarchist spouse of the most corrupt man (sp) who ever held the office of president, and a totally inexperienced Muslim-raised (sp) talking head with a resume of zero.

No offense to my friends at the paper, but you guys must be desperate to fill up space. Don’t get me wrong, it’s entertaining, and I know this guy writes on your blog.

But plain and simple, this is defamatory. It may be folksy defamation, written by some clever white guy from Libuse, but give all of your readers a break and attempt to appeal to some common sense of honesty, equality, and decency.

I mean, Gannett published this. They’re the same folks who publish USA Today.

The Republic (sp) nominee is the son and grandson of U.S. Navy admirals, a Vietnam war hero who spent five-plus tortuous years in a North Vietnamese prison when he could have opted to be set free but would not do so without his fellow prisoners also being released.

John McCain is a veteran of many years of public service in Congress and has shown his ability to work across party lines to get things accomplished. Hi (sp) is a man of integrity.

Yes, all of this was a preface to lead into Bruce Willis’s John McCain’s biography. (Parentheticals mine).

The Democratic candidate has promised higher taxes of all kinds (1), doesn’t want to utilize this country’s ability to eliminate foreign oil dependence (2), wants to totally ruin the best health-care system in the entire world (3), would sit down with the most depraved of despots (4) and would extend and begin social programs that would make FDR look like a tightwad (5).

1) Total lie

2) Total lie

3) Total lie

4) George, come on:

5) Not sure what FDR would look like.

In short, the 2008 presidential election should be a no-brainer.

Consider what the Democrat-controlled Congress hasn’t done since gaining the majority. Who do we as Americans want to fill the two or three upcoming vacancies on the Supreme Court? Do you want a strong military? Do you believe in personal achievement or handouts from taxpayers? Are you swayed by political promises are (sp) by a lifetime of successful public service?

There is but one choice in this election. We must have a man of unquestionable integrity as the leader of the United States. That man is Sen. John McCain.

In all honesty, George, this is the worst endorsement letter for any candidate I have ever read (You somehow manage to look superficial, racist, dishonest, and superfluous all at the same time. Even my Republican buddies are deeply offended).

I doubt you’ll ever be able to understand why it is so offensive, but hey, at least you can always try your hand at movie reviews.

Louisiana Refuses to Put Libertarian, Socialist Party Presidential Candidates on Ballot

Apparently, the filing deadline was September 2nd, and both Bob Barr (the Libertarian) and Brian Moore (the Socialist) didn’t “file their electors” on time.

One small problem, though: The Secretary of State’s Office was closed from September 2nd through September 5th due to Hurricane Gustav. To be fair, the Secretary’s Office did extend the deadline, but it’s not clear whether or not they actually told anyone about the extension.

So when Bob Barr filed on September 10th and Brian Moore followed suit a day later, both men were denied a spot on the Presidential ballot.

Now they’re suing:

On September 13, the Libertarian Party and the Socialist Party filed a lawsuit to get their presidential candidates on the Louisiana ballot. Libertarian Party et al v Dardenne. Lawsuits can be filed on weekends in some U.S. District Courts, via electronic filing. The case number is not known yet. Both parties were late filing their presidential electors. The lawsuit argues that since the Secretary of State’s office was closed the week of September 2-5, and since the state has postponed its congressional primary until October, due to hurricanes, the state should also have extended the filing deadline. The state did permit filing on September 8, but did not post this notice on its web page. The Libertarian filing was on September 10 and the Socialist filing was on September 11.

Now, I know this may come as a surprise to my friends on the local Republican blog who think I am a socialist, but I’ve never heard of Brian Moore before (his webpage reminds me of Geocities circa 1996).

I am, however, familiar with Bob Barr, the former Georgia Congressman who, believe it or not, is polling around 1%-3% nationwide (about the same as perennial candidate Ralph Nader).

By the way, those socialists are so mad they’re even taking up for Barr. (H/t to the Dead Pelican):

Moore stated that this action by the state of Louisiana is not only an “attempted disenfranchisement of the state’s socialist-leaning voters,” but was also an obvious attempt by Gov. Jindal and Secretary Dardenne, both of whom are Republicans, “to protect John McCain and the GOP from the Libertarian Party’s Bob Barr and other alternative candidates.” Moore also noted that Gov. Jindal, “a rising star in the GOP,” had been on McCain’s short list of vice-presidential possibilities.  “These guys are using a natural disaster to keep Bob Barr and myself off the ballot,” Moore stated.  “After Katrina, one would think the last thing they’d want to do is to take political advantage of another hurricane.  It’s unconscionable.”

The Socialist Party’s presidential ticket received 1,795 votes in Louisiana in 2004, finishing sixth in a nine-candidate field.  This year the party hopes to be on the ballot in at least ten states — the most since 1952.  The Libertarian Party’s Bob Barr, who has already been certified for the ballot in forty-four states, had been registering as high as six percent in national polls earlier this summer and is seen as a real threat to McCain’s prospects in November.

Sorry about the socialistic typeset. For some reason, socialistic WordPress won’t let me fix it.

Computer Literacy

Last night, I personally wrote Jonah Goldberg, the editor-at-large of The National Review Online, to express my observations on one of his latest blog entries. Mr. Goldberg, who was hoisted into the national spotlight due to his mother’s friendship with Linda Tripp, dug up an eight-year-old article in The Boston Globe in order to propound the argument that Senator John McCain cannot use a computer because of injuries he sustained as a prisoner of war, a claim that was repeated today by none other than Karl Rove.

First Mr. Goldberg:

Well, I guess it depends on what you mean by “extraordinary.” The reason he doesn’t send email is that he can’t use a keyboard because of the relentless beatings he received from the Viet Cong in service to our country.

And then Mr. Rove:

But they then say he doesn’t even know how to use a — you know, doesn’t send e-mail. Well, this is because his war injuries keep him from being able to use a keyboard. He can’t type. You know, it’s like saying he can’t do jumping jacks.

Well, there’s a reason why he can’t raise his arms above his head. There’s a reason why he doesn’t have the nimbleness in his fingers.

To be sure, I can find absolutely no record of Senator McCain ever making such a claim. In fact, Senator McCain has claimed the opposite: He may be “computer illiterate,” but he’s apparently learning how to navigate the Internet and, though he doesn’t know own a Blackberry, he knows how to use one. Quoting McCain from an interview with Politico:

I am learning to get online myself, and I will have that down fairly soon, getting on myself. I don’t expect to be a great communicator, I don’t expect to set up my own blog, but I am becoming computer literate to the point where I can get the information that I need — including going to my daughter’s blog first, before anything else….

I use the Blackberry, but I don’t e-mail, I’ve never felt the particular need to e-mail.

In other words, Senator McCain is physically capable of using a computer (and he is apparently learning how to do so), but he is still, for all intents and purposes, computer illiterate. Still, we have proof he knows how to type:

The title page of Senator McCain’s hand-typed essay to the National War College, 1974.

Please don’t mistake the intention of this post: I have the utmost respect for Senator McCain’s service and sacrifice to our country, and I certainly don’t mean to diminish the extent of the injuries he sustained as a prisoner of war.

But the attempt to deflect criticisms of McCain’s self-admitted computer illiteracy by falsely suggesting this is due to a physical disability is offensive– not just to the Senator himself, but also to the millions of disabled Americans who, despite their conditions, learn how to adapt and adjust.

It’s a ridiculous excuse– not one propagated by the McCain campaign, but one that is being broadcast by individuals who seem to lack even the most basic understanding of the ways in which disabled people can use computers, individuals who, when backed into a corner, only know how to lash out by invoking hyperbolic invectives– as if the criticism of McCain’s computer illiteracy is somehow making fun of the injuries he sustained in Vietnam.

Sure, it’s not the most important issue in this campaign, and maybe, to some, it’s silly that the Obama campaign would even point out McCain’s computer illiteracy. But the phony outrage, constructed upon a phony diagnosis of Senator McCain, is exploitative, ignorant, and patronizing.

When I was in college, I tutored a disabled kid who learned how to use a computer through an ingenious system in which he inhaled and exhaled into a tube. According to Mr. Goldberg, people like this young man only learn how to use a computer because he “needs it to get through life.”

Pardon me for this, but Jonah Goldberg, to me, will always appear far more limited and disabled than the young man I tutored. To me, it’s far more constraining to live in a continued state of solipsistic self-righteousness and cynical dismissiveness than it is to live in a world that celebrates people who, despite their physical disability or any other limitation, refuse to use their conditions as an excuse to remain ignorant.

As a child, whenever I became frustrated with my own physical disability (cerebral palsy), my late father would tell me, “Son, everyone has a disability. It’s just that people can see yours.” In his view, the unseen handicaps were often the worst– racism, bigotry, arrogance, ignorance, selfishness, and addiction– conditions that prevent people from understanding their common humanity.

Now, I’m not suggesting I am perfect or somehow immune to “unseen handicaps.”

Still, the point remains: When you exaggerate or exploit another human being’s physical limitations as an excuse for their willful ignorance, you are actually stripping them of their common humanity and cheapening their struggles.

Consumer Choice for Television Act: What They Haven’t Told Us

In late June of this year, Louisiana Governor Bobby Jindal signed into law SB 807, now Act 433 and also known by the Orwellian moniker, “The Consumer Choice for Television Act.” The bill was introduced by State Senator Ann Duplessis and was touted as a way of increasing competition and choice among cable companies in Louisiana; this, ostensibly, will benefit the consumer.

It’s unclear how, exactly, this Act will increase competition and choice, but we do know one thing: It had the strong support and backing of big telecommunications companies like AT&T and their related lobbyists and PACs, and its passage here in Louisiana is a feat they had already accomplished in 19 other states.

Essentially, this Act is a piece of deregulation legislation; it strips municipal and parish governments from negotiating their own cable franchise agreements and places the authority in the hands of the Secretary of State– who, from the looks of it, will only serve to rubber-stamp applications.

There are some real legal and Constitutional problems with the Act, which is why the Louisiana Municipal Association along with the State Police Jury Association, among others, are mounting a challenge.

One of the principal problems with the Act is its conflicts with municipalities who are governed by a Home Rule Charter. The Act specifically exempted municipalities whose Charter was enacted prior to 1974 (i.e. New Orleans and Baton Rouge), yet it makes no mention of how it will address municipalities who passed their Charters after 1974. Interestingly, the exemption of New Orleans (home of the State Senator who introduced the bill) and Baton Rouge undercuts one of the principle arguments supporting the bill– that it will “streamline” the application process and place all negotiations in the hands of the State. Baton Rouge and New Orleans account for between 15% – 20% of the State’s population. Quoting from the Act:

With respect to local governmental subdivisions which have home rule charters adopted after the Constitution of Louisiana was adopted on April 20, 1974, and which are governed by Article VI, Section 5 of the Constitution of  Louisiana and with respect to other local governmental subdivisions without home rule charters, such local governmental subdivisions are denied the authority to adopt ordinances that are inconsistent with the provisions of this Chapter.

Why April 20, 1974? Because that’s the day that the “new” Louisiana Constitution ratified into law, and among other things, the Constitution provides (paraphrasing):

The 1974 constitution granted broad home rule authority to parishes and municipalities and reversed the traditional concept of local government as a “creature of the state” possessing only delegated authority.

New Orleans’s charter was passed in 1952; Baton Rouge’s was passed in 1947. Sure, it’s a technicality, but it’s an important one.

To be sure, I am not a lawyer, but on the face of it, I am not sure how this Act could supersede the authority given to Home Rule Charter municipalities based on whether or not their Charters were passed prior to the ratification of the State Constitution.

Regardless, this Act doesn’t appear to be truly concerned with increasing competition; it appears to be nothing more than a way to allow telecommunications companies to avoid negotiating their agreements with the very communities they serve.

The Organic Consumer’s Association puts it this way (bold mine):

Video Franchising: Louisiana legislators, under pressure from major service providers, enacted SB 807, a statewide video franchising bill.  Telecommunication service providers argue that these franchises, which create a single statewide simplified process of offering cable services, could have benefits for the public, such as slightly increasing competition.  The Louisiana legislation, however, failed to include certain consumer protections and community benefits, such as support for Public Educational and Government (PEG) stations, protection of municipal control and the assurance of required build-out to underserved and un-served areas, and is therefore not in the public interest.

Specifically:

Among the worst provisions:

  • Build-out requirements are completely prohibited:  A key component of why service providers favor statewide franchises is they provide them the ability to selectively deploy new network technology. Under Senate Bill 807, there is no community-wide build out obligation.
  • Reduction of municipal control and ability to negotiate for community benefits.
  • No substantial PEG protections.

Some, such as Jeffrey Sadow, have attempted to argue that opposition to this Act is merely the result of cynical, money-grubbing municipalities who want to “milk consumers,” which, in my personal opinion, completely and totally misses the point. Ironically, Sadow begins his argument by cautioning people to follow the money:

One reliable way to find out political motives – especially when somebody is claiming they are doing something for reasons other than this – is to follow the money. And when money is involved, you can be sure the citizenry is getting the short end of a deal.

It is ironic because this Act was one of the most heavily-lobbied pieces of legislation in the previous session, and if you were to take Sadow’s suggestion seriously, you’d find that hundreds of thousands if not millions of dollars have been expended by telecommunication companies and their related advocacy groups, not by local governments.

The opposition has nothing to do with municipalities wanting more money; it has everything to do with them wanting to ensure that cable companies– companies that rely on local infrastructure (like telephone polls) and depend on local support– are held accountable to the unique needs and demands of the communities they serve.

Ultimately, municipal leaders– just like State leaders– understand that telecoms typically pass down increased costs back to the consumer, and ultimately, municipal leaders recognize that their communities need cable companies as much as those companies need those communities.

For extensive coverage of these issues, check out the Lafayette Pro Fiber blog.

Ike is Almost as Big as Texas Itself

Alexandria is about 220 miles away from Houston, Texas, and according to CNN, the storm spans across 550 miles. We’re still getting hit by the outer-bands of the storm. This is all worth noting, because, as Mayor Roy pointed out early yesterday morning, the moisture that Gustav left behind creates a very precarious situation for those of us in Central Louisiana.

An Update on Ike

It’s been raining steadily here in Alexandria for the past two hours; we’re getting hit by the most outer-band of Hurricane Ike. Although initially it looked like we had been hit by over an inch of rain in the past hour, the latest map from the National Weather Service looks like this:

Between a quarter and a half an inch of rain between 8:11PM CST and 9:11CST. And this is just the beginning.

We lost power for about two seconds. A transformer blew out right down the street. But things are up and working now.

This storm is huge. Houston is squarely in its target, and yet, as of now, there’s been more rain here than in Houston. My friends in Houston say their power (already) keeps going on and off. Again, good luck guys.

For an even more comprehensive aggregate than I posted earlier, check out this site.

Bracing for Ike

Yesterday, I somehow ruptured a tendon in my foot, which, as one of my friends puts it, totally ruins the rest of my football season and guarantees I’ll be limping (even more) around for the next few days, all while bracing and preparing for the next Big Hurricane, Ike (which I assume is a either nickname for Dwight Eisenhower or a tribute to the late, notorious Ike Turner).

An acquaintance forwarded me this website, which is an aggregate of all of the weather maps of Ike that are out there on the Interwebs. It’s a great resource. You should check it often.

Best of luck to my friends in Houston, who decided to brave this one out even though they’re electricity addicts. It appears as if you guys are in for it. Stay safe and dry and well-nourished. And keep making ice, since everyone in Houston is apparently sold out.

Here in Alexandria, it appears like there’s a good chance it’s going to be windy (which it already is):

And rainy:

The Whole Story

H/t to the Reduct Box